The
Pacemaker
Game-changing
ideas are those that alter or change the landscape of a particular topic or
field. Some of these game-changing ideas
have been in the form of inventions that were discovered by accident with
unintentional errors. One such game changer is that of the pacemaker, which is
responsible for bringing about a serious change for patients suffering from
heartbeat irregularities.
The Accident
An electrical engineer by the name of Wilson Greatbatch from
the University of Buffalo in the year 1956 was working on a circuit for a
Chronic Disease Research Institute to record heart sounds at the time. However
while assembling his device, he installed an incorrect resistor into his
circuit and as a result, he discovered
that his circuit was pulsing at what sounded like a heartbeat. Familiar with heartbeat irregularities, Wilson Greatbatch
realized the potential for his mistake; however, it would not be until 1958
when he met with William Chardack from the Buffalo Veterans Administration
Hospital and both men successfully tested the device on a dog. Later in 1960,
ten pacemakers would be installed into human patients successfully as a result
of Greatbatch’s original mistake (Technology Review , 2001 ) .
The Forces that Supported
The advent of the pacemaker filled the demand from a need for
medical patients suffering from heart complications in order to regulate their
heart beat. In this case, the invention
took some time before it could even get off of the ground due to the simple
fact of a lack of enthusiasm from the initial time it was discovered. The real
push forward was the test conducted in 1958 with William Chardack when they
successfully tested the pacemaker on a live dog to determine whether or not the
device would work. This was essential to the pacemaker taking off in the
medical field, as it solidified the fact that the device was capable of working
and serving a benefit to the medical world.
Points Learned
Wilson Greatbatch was an electrical engineer that
developed a medical device; it was not until he was able to work with a medical
doctor willing to test his device that it would start to gain traction in the
medical field. This point is important because it shows that for this
particular accidental invention, it took an actual test in order by experts in
the medical field before it would be widely accepted. This brings to the
forefront the issue that many startup companies face and that is gaining
traction with their new idea and bringing it to market (Davila &
Epstein, 2014) .
The second point taken is that even though
the product was developed and worked, Wilson Greatbatch continued to make
improvements on his product and eventually developed a corrosion-free lithium battery which extended the life of his
pacemakers from two years to ten years (Technology Review , 2001 ) . This was a
breakthrough innovation, but Greatbatch continued to improve on his discovery,
which is what is called incremental innovation, where the product being
developed continues to be refined and made better (Davila &
Epstein, 2014) .
Conclusion
In conclusion, the advent of the pacemaker was a
breakthrough innovation that helped to greatly benefit a population of patients
within the medical field suffering from heart irregularities. The support for
this innovation came from an expert in the medical field who helped the inventor
successfully test his device causing it to gain traction in the medical field.
The inventor then continued an incremental refinement of his device as time
went on refining his product for the benefit of the patients.
References
Davila, T., & Epstein, M. J. (2014). The
innovation paradox . San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Technology Review . (2001 ). Setting the pace. Technology
Review , 104(7), 96 .
No comments:
Post a Comment